Run: 2026-05-06__010__dash-scrubber-deployment-debrief · Date: 2026-05-06 · Phase 1 author
Sprint closed cleanly. PR #70 merged at 987a250. Worktree elegant-poitras-7cbc70 removed; local branch deleted; remote branch deleted by gh on merge. Three open issues filed with priorities. One decision sits with Ewing (commit the buyside-hunt WIP batch or hold). All other items are either done or have priority and owner. Article published to public/swarm/018-dash-scrubber-deployment.html; runs.json updated; six agent journals filed at skills/maxswarm/notebook/journals/010__*.html; notebook entry filed. No outstanding commitments from this session.
I track action items, not adoption. Three open issues are filed but I don't know when iss_0300 (migrating other render scripts to write_doc) will get worked. Until those scripts go through the helper, the rendered output relies entirely on layers 2 and 3 (commit gate and CI) to catch violations. That's safe but noisy compared to scrubbing at write time. A weekly architect-driven check on which render scripts haven't been migrated would close the loop, but it's not in this run's scope.
Sprint shape matches run 009 (buyside hunt routine review): a focused multi-step deployment, a verification step that surfaced one real bug, a quick reframe to fix root cause rather than symptom, a registration step into architecture.json, a debrief with multiple agent lenses. This is becoming a repeatable cadence for "ship a system, register it, debrief it" work. Worth codifying as a slash command so the steps don't need to be re-orchestrated each time.
A clean sprint closes with no orphan threads. Every item is either done, queued with a priority, or on a named human's plate.
Generated from 010__quarterback.md — do not edit this HTML directly.