Run: 2026-05-04__008__salesfinity-weekly-pipeline · Date: 2026-05-04 17:30 MT · Phase 4 author
Verdict: PASS with CONCERNS. The output is accurate, evidence-backed, and contains no fabricated data. All required tables from the assignment brief are present. The status banner correctly communicates the data gap. The three priority actions are specific (named owner, time estimate, blocker) — not generic "follow up" language. CONCERNS: (1) S4 currency events across all agents cannot be fully validated because no call data exists to cross-check against. (2) The pre-flight git pull step failed silently — conductor continued without surfacing this to the user. This should have been flagged explicitly.
My PROTOCOL_CHECKLIST runs on the final synthesized output, but I cannot check whether Salesfinity actually has call data that was missed due to the auth gap. The PASS verdict is conditional on the data gap explanation being correct — if Salesfinity had been authenticated and returned 500 calls, this verdict would need to be revisited. The PASS is accurate for what was produced; it does not certify that nothing was missed.
In Run #007, audit-quality caught "fabricated verdict + missing journals + missing notebook before push." In Run #008, the journals and notebook are all present, the verdict is accurate, and no data was fabricated. The improvement from #007 is real — the conductor handled the data gap correctly rather than papering over it. The remaining gap: git pull failure was not surfaced to the user. This matches Run #007's finding that silent failures accumulate into stale state.
Next time I review a null-data output, I will explicitly add a checklist item: "Are all empty tables empty for documented reasons, or empty because data was never checked?" — this run answered "documented reasons," but the question should be standard.
Generated from 008__audit-quality.md — do not edit this HTML directly.